The Oberon 3 is the best built of the four speakers in the ranking. It has the largest woofer of the group — seven inches of wood fibre, with the SMC technology Dali uses on dearer models too. It is a speaker that, to the eye, seems to cost more than it does.
So why is it fourth? Not for the build. For value with an entry amp — which is what the ranking measures. It is a distinction this review holds firm, because otherwise the verdict would sound unfair. Prices, as for all of them, are for the pair.
Context
Dali is a Danish maker, and the Oberon series is its entry line — but with a quality ambition. The Oberon 3 is the larger bookshelf model, above the Oberon 1: it carries a seven-inch wood-fibre woofer and a 29 mm soft textile dome tweeter, the same layout as the higher range.
In our bookshelf-speaker ranking it sits fourth. But the order measures return with a 30-50 watt amp, not pure quality, and the verdict explains why.
Design & build
Build is its first argument, and it is the best of the four. The cabinet is high-density CNC-machined MDF, with internal bracing and acoustic damping, dressed in high-grade vinyl — four finishes (Black Ash, Light Oak, Dark Walnut, white) all finished well enough to make it look like a speaker from a class above. The 18 cm woofer has a wood-fibre cone and the SMC (Soft Magnetic Compound) magnet system, the technology Dali uses to reduce motor distortion.
The tweeter is a lightweight 29 mm textile dome, wide in dispersion. What Hi-Fi? finds the stereo image better without angling the speakers at the listener, and SECRETS reports aggressive treble when they are angled in or used without grilles. The port is rear-firing; the terminals are single-wire.
What reviewers say
The sound character on this page does not come from our own listening: we report it from published reviews, with the name of the person who wrote them.
What Hi-Fi? (January 2019 review) hears deep, weighty bass for a standmount and a big sound that is comfortable at high volume, with good stereo imaging that improves when the speakers face straight ahead rather than being angled at the listener. The large rear port makes them a poor fit for small rooms or close-to-wall placement. The limits: they are less engaging at low volume, the bass emphasis comes at the expense of voices and treble, which sound less open, and the woofer and tweeter do not blend as well as they might.
SECRETS (Jim Milton, May 2020) tested them together with the DALI E-9 F subwoofer, and its verdict should be read with that in mind. It finds them articulate with voices, with a slightly forward midrange and a big soundstage; the treble turns aggressive with the speakers angled at the listener or with the grilles off, and on their own they do not go very deep.
Vinyl performance
On vinyl, the two reviews do not agree on voices: SECRETS finds them articulate, with a slightly forward midrange, while What Hi-Fi? hears a bass emphasis that comes at the expense of voices and treble. Both describe a big soundstage.
It wants space: because of the large rear port, What Hi-Fi? advises against small rooms and close-to-wall placement. And it wants current: at 87 dB it is the least sensitive of the four, and at 6 ohms it asks for an amp with some muscle, around 40-80 watts, not a bare thirty.
Value & competition
Here the paradox resolves. The Oberon 3 is, for build, the best of the four. But the ranking orders by return per euro with an entry amp, and on that yardstick the Oberon pays for three things at once: it is the most expensive (~£499 the pair, the last Richer Sounds list price, checked on 23 October 2026: it is no longer sold new there), the least sensitive (87 dB) and it is 6 ohms — so it is the one that asks the most of a truly entry-level amp.
Against the others: the Triangle (first) is more sensitive and easier to drive, the Wharfedale (second) cheaper. The Q Acoustics (third) is a touch more sensitive (88 versus 87 dB) and less expensive; the Oberon repays it on build. It is fourth for this ranking's angle.
In the vinyl chain
The practical advice is clear: give it an amp with a little reserve. A 40-80 watt integrated is the right choice; with a bare thirty watts, an easier speaker is the better pick. In our amplifier ranking, aim at the more muscular models of the class. With a source and cartridge to match — the idea of the £800 system, but reaching up — is where the Oberon belongs.
A note on availability: outside Italy the Oberon 3 goes through hi-fi dealers and, in the UK and US, the used market via eBay; the generalist channels do not carry it everywhere. It is not a fault of the product, it is how hi-fi at this level is sold.
- The best build in the ranking: CNC MDF cabinet, four well-finished finishes
- Deep, weighty bass for a standmount and a big sound (What Hi-Fi?)
- 7" wood-fibre woofer with SMC magnet system
- Good stereo imaging even without angling them at the listener (What Hi-Fi?)
- The least sensitive of the group (87 dB) and 6 ohms: it wants an amp with reserve
- The most expensive in the ranking
- Large rear port: no small rooms or close-to-wall placement (What Hi-Fi?)
- Bass emphasis at the expense of voices and treble, less engaging at low volume (What Hi-Fi?); aggressive treble when angled in or without grilles (SECRETS)
- Single binding posts: no bi-wiring
Amp: an integrated with reserve, 40-80 watts the sweet spot (the more muscular models in our ranking). Source: a turntable and cartridge that are already serious. Stands: rigid, tweeter at ear height, away from the wall for the port (What Hi-Fi?). Aim: straight ahead, no toe-in, as both What Hi-Fi? and SECRETS suggest. If your amp is at the bottom: look at the Triangle or the Wharfedale.
Verdict
Buy the Oberon 3 if you put build quality ahead of ease of drive, and if your amp has — or will have — a few watts more than the entry average. It is the best-built speaker of the four.
Consider it carefully, though, if your amp is truly at the bottom or the budget is tight: there the Triangle or the Wharfedale are easier and cost less, and it is the honest reason the Oberon is fourth in a ranking that rewards return, not absolute quality.